Türkiye’de Karbon ve Su Ayak İzi Göstergelerinin Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Politikalarındaki Yeri: Uzman Görüşlerine Dayalı Nitel Bir Değerlendirme
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23067943Anahtar Kelimeler:
Karbon Ayak İzi, Su Ayak İzi, Çevre Politikaları, Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma, Nitel AraştırmaÖzet
Bu çalışma, Türkiye'nin çevre politikaları, kurumsal kapasitesi ve karar alma süreçlerini çevresel ayak izi göstergeleri bağlamında alan uzmanlarının değerlendirmelerine dayalı nitel bir yaklaşımla incelemektedir. Karbon ayak izi (KAİ) ve su ayak izi (SAİ) göstergeleri çoğunlukla çevresel performansın ölçülmesinde kullanılan teknik araçlar olarak ele alınmakta; ancak bu göstergelerin politika oluşturma ve uygulama süreçlerine ne ölçüde yansıtıldığı sınırlı düzeyde incelenmektedir. Bu çalışma, söz konusu boşluğa katkı sağlamayı amaçlayarak karbon ve su ayak izi göstergelerinin Türkiye'deki çevre politikaları ve kurumsal uygulamalar açısından nasıl değerlendirildiğini uzman görüşleri temelinde ortaya koymaktadır.
Araştırma, sürdürülebilir kalkınma ve çevre politikaları alanında uzman beş akademisyenin yazılı değerlendirmelerinin betimsel analizine dayanmaktadır. Bulgular, Türkiye'de karbon ayak izi konusunda farkındalığın son yıllarda arttığını; ancak bu farkındalığın politika uygulamalarına ve kurumsal karar alma süreçlerine yeterince yansımadığını göstermektedir. Buna karşılık su ayak izi kavramının hem kamuoyu hem de politika süreçlerinde görece sınırlı düzeyde kullanıldığı belirlenmiştir. Uzman değerlendirmeleri, kurumsal koordinasyon eksikliği, fosil yakıt bağımlılığı ve tarımsal sulamadaki yapısal sorunları temel engeller olarak öne çıkarırken; yenilenebilir enerji yatırımları, çevre eğitiminin yaygınlaştırılması, dijital teknolojilerin kullanımı ve bütüncül politika yaklaşımı önemli fırsatlar olarak değerlendirilmektedir. Bu çerçevede çalışma, sürdürülebilir kalkınma politikalarının çevresel ayak izi göstergelerini yalnızca teknik ölçüm araçları olarak değil, politika tasarımı, uygulama ve izleme süreçlerini destekleyen stratejik karar araçları olarak ele alacak biçimde yeniden yapılandırılması gerektiğini vurgulamaktadır.
İndirmeler
Referanslar
Afreefir, M. A., ve Khalifa, W. M. S. (2025). Achieving Environmental Sustainability in Turkey: The Role of Green Production Processes, Trade Globalization, Renewable Energy Consumption and Economic Growth. Sustainability, 17(21), 9823. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219823
Aguilos, M., Leggett, Z., Jeffries, S., Lupek, M., ve Ardon, M. (2025). University students’ ecological footprint and lifestyle changes: awareness vs. action. Education Sciences, 15(4), 432. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040432
Akbar, A., Rehman, A., Ullah, S., ve Khan, M. A. (2022). Water stress, governance quality and environmental sustainability: Evidence from developing economies. Journal of Environmental Management, 322, 116084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116084
Akbarian-Saravi, N., Larizadeh, R., Gupta, A., Shum, D., ve Milani, A. S. (2025). Life cycle assessment sheds new insights toward sustainable management of biodegradable resin blends used in packaging: A case study on PBAT. Sustainability, 17(19), 8645. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17198645
Aktürk, E., ve Gültekin, S. (2025). The impact of food production on ecological footprint in Turkey: An analysis across agriculture, livestock, and aquaculture. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 27, 30903–30928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04944-4
Al-Zubairi, A., Al-Akheli, A., ve Elfarra, B. (2022). The impact of financial development, renewable energy and political stability on carbon emissions: Sustainable development prospective for Arab economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 73534–73550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21086-7
Ameh, B. (2024). Digital tools and AI: Using technology to monitor carbon emissions and waste at each stage of the supply chain. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 13(1), 2741–2754. https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.13.1.1995
Bekiroğlu, O. (2011). Sürdürülebilir kalkınmanın yeni kuralı: Karbon ayak izi (II. Elektrik Tesisat Ulusal Kongresi bildirisi). Elektrik Mühendisleri Odası. http://www.emo.org.tr/ekler/49c17cab08ed10e_ek.pdf
Bektaş, H., Yıldız, R., ve Demir, M. (2024). AB sınırda karbon düzenlemesi ve Türkiye sanayisine etkileri. TÜSİAD. https://www.tusiad.org/tr/yayinlar/raporlar/item/11420-ab-sinirda-karbon-duzenlemesi-ve-turkiye-sanayisine-etkileri
Bilalova, S., Jäger, N. W., Newig, J., Huitema, D., ve Koehler, J. K. L. (2026). Paradigms of water governance: a systematic review. Ecology and Society, 31(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-16482-310108
Bogner, A., Littig, B., ve Menz, W. (Eds.). (2009). Interviewing experts: An introduction to a new methodological debate (ECPR Research Methods). Palgrave Macmillan.
Burek, P., Satoh, Y., Fischer, G., Kahil, T., Scherzer, A., Tramberend, S., Nava Jiménez, L. F., Wada, Y., Eisner, S., Flörke, M., Hanasaki, N., Magnuszewski, P., Cosgrove, B., ve Wiberg, D. (2016). Water futures and solutions initiative: Fast track assessment to 2050 (IIASA Working Paper WP-16-006). International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/13008/1/WP-16-006.pdf
Caggiano, H., ve Weber, E. U. (2023). Advances in qualitative methods in environmental research. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 48, 3.1-3.19. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-112321-080106
Chapagain, A. K., ve Hoekstra, A. Y. (2007). The water footprint of coffee and tea consumption in the Netherlands. Ecological Economics, 64(1), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.022
Chapagain, A. K., Hoekstra, A. Y., Savenije, H. H. G., ve Gautam, R. (2006). The water footprint of cotton consumption: An assessment of the impact of worldwide consumption of cotton products on the water resources in the cotton producing countries. Ecological Economics, 60(1), 186–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.11.027
Damtoft, J. S., Lukasik, J., Herfort, D., Sorrentino, D., ve Gartner, E. M. (2008). Sustainable development and climate change initiatives. Cement and Concrete Research, 38(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.09.008
Demeke, B. W., Rathore, L. S., Mekonnen, M. M., ve Liu, W. (2024). Spatiotemporal dynamics of the water footprint and virtual water trade in global cotton production and trade. Cleaner Production Letters, 7, 100074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clpl.2024.100074
Destek, M. A., ve Sarkodie, S. A. (2019). Investigation of environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: The role of energy and financial development. Science of the Total Environment, 650, 2483–2489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.017
Diesendorf, M. (2000). Sustainability and sustainable development. In D. Dunphy, J. Benveniste, A. Griffiths, ve P. Sutton (Eds.), Sustainability: The corporate challenge of the 21st century (pp. 19–37). Allen ve Unwin.
Ertekin, P. (2012). Sürdürülebilir kaynak kullanımına yönelik çevre eğitimi uygulamalarının ilköğretim öğrencilerinin karbon ayak izi konusunda bilinçlenmeleri üzerine etkisi (Yüksek lisans tezi). Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi.
Falkenmark, M., Lundqvist, J., ve Widstrand, C. (1989). Macro-scale water scarcity requires micro-scale approaches: Aspects of vulnerability in semi-arid development. Natural Resources Forum, 13(4), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.1989.tb00348.x
FAO. (2015). AQUASTAT main database. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/aquastat/
FAO. (2017). Water for sustainable food and agriculture: A report produced for the G20 Presidency of Germany. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/3/i7959e/i7959e.pdf
Finkbeiner, M. (2014). Introduction to life cycle assessment. In W. Klöpffer ve M. Curran (Eds.), LCA compendium – The complete world of life cycle assessment. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8697-3
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363
Galli, A., Wiedmann, T., Ercin, E., Knoblauch, D., ve Giljum, S. (2012). Integrating ecological, carbon and water footprint into a “Footprint Family” of indicators: Definition and role in tracking human pressure on the planet. Ecological Indicators. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.017
Gálos, B., Mátyás, C., ve Jacob, D. (2011). Regional characteristics of climate change altering effects of afforestation. Environmental Research Letters, 6(4), 044010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/044010
Georgescu, I., ve Kinnunen, J. (2024). Dynamic interactions between GDP, renewable energy, innovation, and CO₂ emissions in Finland: A Fourier-augmented ARDL analysis. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 17(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12076-023-00312-1
Giwa, A., ve Dindi, A. (2017). An investigation of the feasibility of proposed solutions for water sustainability and security in water-stressed environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 165, 721–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.120
Govoni, C., Chiarelli, D. D., ve Rulli, M. C. (2024). A global dataset of the national green and blue water footprint of livestock feeds. Scientific Data, 11, 98. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-04264-2
Guest, G., Bunce, A., ve Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Guinée, J. B., Heijungs, R., ve van der Voet, E. (2008). A framework for life cycle impact assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(5), 549–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.02.002
Guo, R., Zhao, Y., Shi, Y., Li, F., Hu, J., ve Yang, H. (2017). Low carbon development and local sustainability from a carbon balance perspective. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 122, 270–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.02.019
Güldal, H. T. (2025). Türkiye’de sürdürülebilir kalkınma amaçlarının tarım ve çevreyle ilgili hedeflerinde zamansal eğilim analizi (2000–2023). Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi, 60(3), 2248-2260. https://doi.org/10.63556/tisej.2025.1558
Hametner, M. (2022). Economics without ecology: How the SDGs fail to align socioeconomic development with environmental sustainability. Ecological Economics, 199, 107490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107490
Harmancıoğlu, N. B., Barbaros, F., ve Çetinkaya, C. P. (2013). Sustainability issues in water management. Water Resources Management, 27, 1867–1891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0172-4
Harris, J. M. (2000). Basic principles of sustainable development (Working Paper No. 00-04). Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.15600
He, Y., ve Ren, Y. (2023). Can carbon sink insurance and financial subsidies improve the carbon sequestration capacity of forestry? Journal of Cleaner Production, 397, 136618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136618
Helms, M. M., ve Nixon, J. (2010). Exploring SWOT analysis—Where are we now? A review of academic research from the last decade. Journal of Strategy and Management, 3(3), 215–251. https://doi.org/10.1108/17554251011064837
Hertwich, E. G. (2005). Life cycle approaches to sustainable consumption: A critical review. Environmental Science & Technology, 39(13), 4673–4684. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0497375
Higazy, N., Merabet, S., Khalifa, R., Saleh, A., Al-Sayegh, S., Hosseini, H., Wahib, S., Alabsi, R., Zarif, L., Mohamed, M. S., ve Ben Hamadou, R. (2024). Water footprint assessment and virtual water trade in the globally most water-stressed country, Qatar. Water, 16(8), 1185. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16081185
Hill, T., ve Westbrook, R. (1997). SWOT analysis: It’s time for a product recall. Long Range Planning, 30(1), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(96)00095-7
Hoekstra, A. Y. (2011). The water footprint of modern consumer society. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849775526
Hoekstra, A. Y. (Ed.). (2003). Virtual water trade: Proceedings of the International Expert Meeting on Virtual Water Trade (Value of Water Research Report Series No. 12). UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education. https://sswm.info/sites/default/files/reference_attachments/HOEKSTRA%202003%20Virtual%20Water%20Trade.pdf
Hoekstra, A. Y., ve Hung, P. Q. (2002). Virtual water trade: A quantification of virtual water flows between nations in relation to international crop trade (Value of Water Research Report Series No. 11). UNESCO-IHE. https://www.waterfootprint.org/media/downloads/Report11.pdf
Hoekstra, A. Y., ve Mekonnen, M. M. (2012). The water footprint of humanity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(9), 3232–3237. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1109936109
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2022). Mitigation of climate change (Working Group III contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the IPCC). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926
International Organization for Standardization-ISO. (2018). ISO 14067:2018 Greenhouse gases — Carbon footprint of products — Requirements and guidelines for quantification. https://www.iso.org/standard/71206.html
Kaman, D., ve Bozkurt, Y. (2025). Sürdürülebilir kalkınma ve çevre: Geleceği şekillendirecek stratejiler. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (83), 299-316. https://doi.org/10.51290/dpusbe.1581194
Kim, R. E. (2023). Augment the SDG indicator framework. Environmental Science ve Policy, 142, 62–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.02.004
Lawrence, D. P. (2007). Impact significance determination—Pushing the boundaries. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27(8), 770–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2007.02.010
Le Blanc, D. (2015). Towards integration at last? The sustainable development goals as a network of targets. Sustainable Development, 23(3), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1582
Lin, D., Hanscom, L., Murthy, A., Galli, A., Evans, M., Neill, E., Mancini, M. S., Martindill, J., Medouar, F.-Z., Huang, S., ve Wackernagel, M. (2018). Ecological Footprint Accounting for Countries: Updates and Results of the National Footprint Accounts, 2012–2018. Resources, 7(3), 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources7030058
Lincoln, Y. S., ve Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
Linh, H. T., Truc, D. T., Binh, N. T., ve Tri, V. P. D. (2025). Assessing Water Governance Trends and Challenges at a Local Level—An Application of the OECD Water Governance Framework in Soc Trang Province, Vietnam. Water, 17(3), 320. https://doi.org/10.3390/w1703032
Littig, B., ve Griebler, E. (2005). Social sustainability: A catchword between political pragmatism and social theory. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(1/2), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2005.007375
Liu, T., Guan, X., Wei, Y., Xue, S., ve Xu, L. (2023). Impact of economic policy uncertainty on the volatility of China’s emission trading scheme pilots. Energy Economics, 121, 106626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106626
Liu, W., Yang, H., Liu, Y., Kummu, M., Hoekstra, A. Y., Liu, J., ve Schulin, R. (2018). Water resources conservation and nitrogen pollution reduction under global food trade and agricultural intensification. Science of the Total Environment, 633, 1591–1601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.306
Lynas, M. (2007). Carbon counter: Your essential guide to measuring and reducing your carbon footprint. Collins.
Lyu, K., Tian, J., Zheng, J., Zhang, C., ve Yu, L. (2024). Evaluation of water–carbon–ecological footprint and its spatial–temporal changes in the North China Plain. Land, 13(8), 1327. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13081327
Magazzino, C. (2024). Ecological footprint, electricity consumption and economic growth in China: geopolitical risk and natural resources governance. Empirical Economics, 66(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-023-02460-4
Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., ve Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
Matthews, H. S., Hendrickson, C. T., ve Weber, C. L. (2008). The importance of carbon footprint estimation boundaries. Environmental Science ve Technology, 42(16), 5839–5842. https://doi.org/10.1021/es703112w
McKenzie, S. (2004). Social sustainability: Towards some definitions. Hawke Research Institute for Sustainable Societies.
McKeown, R., Hopkins, C., Rizzi, R., ve Chrystalbridge, M. (2002). Education for sustainable development toolkit (2nd ed.). University of Tennessee. https://www.gdrc.org/uem/footprints/ESD_Toolkit_v2.pdf
Montoya-Torres, J., Dillman, K. J., ve Heinonen, J. (2025). Life-cycle environmental impacts of passenger and freight transport: A comparison between the Global North and South. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 5(7), 6571–6592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-025-00612-5
Morelli, J. (2011). Environmental sustainability: A definition for environmental professionals. Journal of Environmental Sustainability, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.14448/jes.01.0002
Nathaniel, S. P. (2021). Ecological footprint, urbanization, and energy consumption in MENA countries: Implications for sustainability. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 1610–1620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10536-0
Novoa, V., Rojas, O., Ahumada-Rudolph, R., Arumí, J. L., Munizaga, J., de la Barrera, F., ve Cabrera-Pardo, J. R. (2023). Water footprint and virtual water flows from the Global South: Foundations for sustainable agriculture in periods of drought. Science of the Total Environment, 869, 161526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161526
Nsabiyeze, A., Ma, R., Li, J., Luo, H., Zhao, Q., Tomka, J., ve Zhang, M. (2023). Tackling climate change in agriculture: A global evaluation of the effectiveness of carbon emission reduction policies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 389, 136048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136048
Ozanne, L. K., Le, C., ve Cahill, D. (2016). Educating for sustainability: Engaging students in real world problem solving. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 17(3), 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-10-2014-0152
Ozcan, H., El-Emam, R. S., ve Amini Horri, B. (2023). Thermochemical looping technologies for clean hydrogen production – Current status and recent advances. Journal of Cleaner Production, 382, 135295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135295
Pan, T., Zhu, X., ve Ye, Y. (2011). Estimate of life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions from a vertical subsurface flow constructed wetland and conventional wastewater treatment plants: A case study in China. Ecological Engineering, 37(2), 248–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.11.014
Pata, U. K., ve Caglar, A. E. (2021). Investigating the EKC hypothesis with renewable energy consumption, human capital, globalization and trade openness for China: Evidence from augmented ARDL approach with a structural break. Energy, 216, 119220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119220
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Pelisser, F., Barcelos, A., Santos, D., Peterson, M., ve Bernardin, A. M. (2012). Lightweight concrete production with low Portland cement consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 23(1), 68–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.010
Pickton, D. W., ve Wright, S. (1998). What’s SWOT in strategic analysis? Strategic Change, 7(2), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1697(199803/04)7:2<101::AID-JSC332>3.0.CO;2-6
Platis, D. P., Menexes, G. C., Anagnostopoulos, C. D., Tsaboula, A. D., Kalburtji, K. L., ve Mamolos, A. P. (2025). Assessing agricultural sustainability: analysis of energy use, carbon and water footprint to maintain ecosystem services in Larissa, Greece. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 10, 607–622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40974-025-00374-8
Polat, İ. H., Doğan, M. S., ve Tosunoğlu, M. (2026). Ecological Footprint Dynamics in Türkiye: An Econometric Assessment Within The Framework of Renewable Energy, Forest Areas, Economic Growth, and Urbanization. International Journal of Economics, Politics and Humanities Studies, 9(1), 30–53. https://doi.org/10.59445/ijephss.1771253
Raihan, A., ve Tuspekova, A. (2022). Towards sustainability: Dynamic nexus between carbon emission and its determining factors in Mexico. Energy Nexus, 8, 100148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2022.100148
Raskin, P. D., Hansen, E., ve Margolis, R. M. (1996). Water and sustainability: Global patterns and long-range problems. Natural Resources Forum, 20(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.1996.tb00629.x
Shahbaz, M., Balsalobre-Lorente, D., ve Jahanger, A. (2020). The relationship between income inequality, economic growth and environmental quality: Fresh evidence from EU. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 41252–41267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09998-9
Shi, C., Wu, C., Zhang, J., Zhang, C., ve Xiao, Q. (2022). Impact of urban and rural food consumption on water demand in China—From the perspective of water footprint. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 34, 148–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.09.006
Sınırda Karbon Düzenlemesi-SKDM. (2023). Sınırda karbon düzenlemesi mekanizması (CBAM) ve Türk ihracatçısı için yol haritası. https://www.casem.com.tr/skdm-nedir/
Sikder, M., Wang, C., Yao, X., Huai, X., Wu, L., KwameYeboah, F., … Dou, X. (2022). The integrated impact of GDP growth, industrialization, energy use, and urbanization on CO₂ emissions in developing countries: Evidence from the panel ARDL approach. Science of the Total Environment, 837, 155795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155795
Sohag, K., Husain, S., ve Soytas, U. (2024). Environmental policy stringency and ecological footprint linkage: Mitigation measures of renewable energy and innovation. Energy Economics, 107(Article 107721). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107721
Tam, V. W. Y., Butera, A., ve Le, K. N. (2021). Mechanical properties of CO₂ concrete utilising practical carbonation variables. Journal of Cleaner Production, 294, 126307.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126307
Temizkan, R., ve Ceyhanlı, K. (2020). Turizm lisans öğrencilerinin ekolojik ayak izi farkındalıkları. Turizm Akademik Dergisi, 7(2), 203–223. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/touraj/issue/58493/629480
Topdağ, S., Şimşek, Ö., ve Kırca, S. (2020). Türkiye’nin su ayak izi ve sürdürülebilir su kullanımı. Çevre Bilimleri Dergisi, 13(2), 45–59. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/cevrebilim/issue/58236/822825
Tosunoğlu, B. T. (2014). Sürdürülebilir küresel refah göstergesi olarak ekolojik ayak izi. HAK-İŞ Uluslararası Emek ve Toplum Dergisi, 3(5), 154–171. https://avesis.anadolu.edu.tr/yayin/2c25c1c9-8f7d-446a-81ae-10de3386703c/surdurulebilir-kuresel-refah-gostergesi-olarak-ekolojik-ayak-izi
Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanlığı Strateji ve Bütçe Başkanlığı (SBB). (2023).
On İkinci Kalkınma Planı (2024–2028). https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/On-Ikinci-Kalkinma-Plani_2024-2028_11122023.pdf
Uddin, N., ve Holtedahl, P. (2013). Emission trading schemes – avenues for unified accounting practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52, 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.017
Usta, A. (2023). Ekonomik büyüme ve çevresel bozulma: Türkiye üzerine zaman serisi analizi. İktisat ve Toplum Dergisi, 55, 78–91. https://iktisatvetoplum.com/2023/03/ekonomik-buyume-ve-cevresel-bozulma-turkiye-uzerine-zaman-serisi-analizi/
Vanham, D., ve Mekonnen, M. M. (2021). The scarcity-weighted water footprint provides misleading water sustainability rankings. Environmental Research Letters, 16(4), 044032. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abe491
Wackernagel, M., ve Beyers, B. (2019). Ecological footprint: Managing our biocapacity budget. New Society Publishers.
Wackernagel, M., ve Rees, W. E. (1996). Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the earth. New Society Publishers.
Wan, S., Liu, L., Chen, G., Wang, P., Lan, Y., ve Zhang, M. (2025). Low-Carbon Transformation of Tourism in Characteristic Towns under the Carbon Neutral Goal: A Three-Dimensional Mechanism Analysis of Tourists, Residents, and Enterprises. Sustainability, 17(11), 5142. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17115142
Wang, K., ve Ke, Y. (2024). Social sustainability of communities: A systematic literature review. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 47, 585–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.04.031
Wang, Z., ve Dong, K. (2019). What drives environmental degradation? Evidence from 14 Sub-Saharan African countries. Science of the Total Environment, 658, 312–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.104
Wang, Z., ve Guan, B. (2025). Research on effect of the digital economy on agricultural carbon emission reduction – based on the moderating effect of institutional quality. Sustainability, 17(24), 10984. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172410984
White, G. F. (1945). Human adjustment to floods (Research Paper No. 29). The University of Chicago Press.
Wiedmann, T., ve Minx, J. (2008). A definition of “carbon footprint”. In C. C. Pertsova (Ed.), Ecological economics research trends (pp. 1–11). Nova Science Publishers.
World Bank. (2015a). High and dry: Climate change, water, and the economy. World Bank Group. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0381-5
World Bank. (2015b). Water security for sustainable development. World Bank Group. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/water/publication/water-security-for-sustainable-development
World Commission on Environment and Development-WCED. (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf
World Economic Forum (WEF). (2024a). Fostering clean energy transitions in emerging economies. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/reports/fostering-clean-energy-transitions-in-emerging-economies/
World Economic Forum (WEF). (2024b). The global risks report 2024 (19th ed.). World Economic Forum. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_Global_Risks_Report_2024.pdf
Wu, J., Yu, H., Cao, N., Zhang, J., Khan, J., ve Lee, D. (2025). Ecological footprint analysis as a tool for advancing Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Evidence from China. Ecological Indicators, 176, 113653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113653
Yıldırım, A., ve Şimşek, H. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (11. baskı). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Zhang, J., Zhang, N., ve Bai, S. (2021). Assessing the carbon emission changing for sustainability and high-quality economic development. Environmental Technology ve Innovation, 22, 101464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2021.101464
Zheng, S., ve Jin, S. (2023). Can companies reduce carbon emission intensity to enhance sustainability? Systems, 11(5), 249. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems1105024
İndir
Yayınlanmış
Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Sayı
Bölüm
Lisans
Telif Hakkı (c) 2026 Premium e-Journal of Social Sciences (PEJOSS)

Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.
