The Role of E-Leadership in Enhancing Team Connectivity and Commitment in Distributed Work Environments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17488272Özet
As organizations increasingly adopt remote and hybrid work models, leadership must evolve to ensure team connectivity and commitment in virtual environments. Traditional leadership theories, which rely on direct supervision and face-to-face interactions, are inadequate in addressing the complexities of geographically dispersed teams. E-leadership has emerged as a critical construct, leveraging digital tools and communication strategies to foster collaboration, engagement, and shared purpose. However, the mechanisms, such as team connectivity, through which e-leadership enhances team commitment remain underexplored.
This study examines the impact of e-leadership on team connectivity and team commitment within the context of software development teams operating in Istanbul’s technology parks. Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), we analyze survey data from 195 new product development (NPD) team members across 46 firms. The findings reveal that e-leadership significantly enhances team connectivity and team commitment. However, contrary to conventional expectations, team connectivity does not mediate the relationship between e-leadership and team commitment, suggesting that commitment in virtual teams is shaped more by leader-member alignment than by peer interactions.
These results contribute to the growing discourse on e-leadership and digital team management by emphasizing the importance of vision-driven leadership, strategic communication, and emotional engagement in distributed teams. The study underscores that effective e-leadership extends beyond enabling digital communication—it must actively cultivate shared purpose, motivation, and trust to sustain commitment in virtual teams.
İndirmeler
Referanslar
Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
Amelkin, V., Askarisichani, O., Kim, Y. J., Malone, T. W., & Singh, A. K. (2018). Dynamics of collective performance in collaboration networks. Plos One, 13(10), e0204547. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0204547
Caridi-Zahavi, O., Carmeli, A., & Arazy, O. (2016). The influence of CEOs' visionary innovation leadership on the performance of high-technology ventures: The mediating roles of connectivity and knowledge integration. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(3), 356–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/ jpim.12299
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research (pp. 295–336). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 002224378101800104
Gupta, M., & Fernandez, J. (2011). How globally distributed software teams can improve their collaboration effectiveness? https://doi.org/10.1109/icgse.2011.30
Hansbrough, T., & Schyns, B. (2018). The appeal of transformational leadership. Organizational Dynamics, publishing serial number 47(4)-2018, 216–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2018.07.008
İşcan, Ö. F. (2002). Dönüşümcü liderlik ve örgütsel değişim ilişkisi: Uygulamalı bir çalışma. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 57(1), 193–206.
Ke, R., Li, M., Ling, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Social connections within executive teams and management forecasts. Management Science, 65(1), 439-457. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2925
Khalid, I. (2024). The role of e-leadership on sustainable employee performance with the mediating effect of perceived team dynamics and moderating effect of organizational support. CRSSS, 2(2), 37-50. https://doi.org/10.59075/xa66hh89
Kleijnen, M., Ruyter, K. D., & Wetzels, M. (2007). An assessment of value creation in mobile service delivery and the moderating role of time consciousness. Journal of Retailing, 83(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2006.10.004
Kniel, J. and Comi, A. (2021). Riding the same wavelength: designers’ perceptions of shared understanding in remote teams. Sage Open, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211040129
MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, publishing serial number 58 - 2007, 593–614. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych. 58.110405.085542
Maurer, M., Bach, N., & Oertel, S. (2022). Forced to go virtual. working-from-home arrangements and their effect on team communication during covid-19 lockdown. German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift Für Personalforschung, 36(3), 238-269. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 23970022221083698
Mercurio, Z. A. (2015). Affective commitment as a core essence of organizational commitment: An integrative literature review. Human Resource Development Review, 14(4), 389–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484315603612
Paganin, G., Avanzi, L., Guglielmi, D., Hera, C., & Mazzetti, G. (2023). How emotional contagion among teachers affects the relationship between transformational leadership and team cohesion. Behavioral Sciences, 13(8), 685. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13080685
Pandey, J. (2023). Role of digital leadership capability in shaping IT innovation. Journal of Global Information Management, 31(8), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.333168
Peiris, K. K. D. I. and Jayathilake, P. (2022). Factors influencing the effective implementation of the remote working teams in insurance companies in sri lanka. Journal of Management Matters, 9(2), 23-37. https://doi.org/10.4038/jmm.v9i2.36
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader satisfaction and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7
Raybourn, E. M. (2020). Why we need strategies for working remotely: the exascale computing project (ecp) panel series.. Proposed for Presentation at the SC20 Held November 17 - October 17, 2020 in Virtual Event, Virtual Event, US.. https://doi.org/10.2172/1825833
Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (2001). Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 825–836. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.825
Sukmawati, R. (2024). Redefining e-leadership: Integrating technology to enhance communication and collaboration. Journal of Leadership Studies, 18(1), 45–60.
Susskind, A., & Odom-Reed, P. (2016). Team member’s centrality, cohesion, conflict, and performance in multi-university geographically distributed project teams. Communication Research, 46(2), 151-178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215626972
Tsareva, E. (2021). Affective commitment and its role in employee retention. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 11(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v11i2.18456
Van Wart, M., Roman, A., Wang, X., & Liu, C. (2019). Integrating ICT adoption issues into (e-)leadership theory. Telematics and Informatics, 36, 248–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.12.003
Waizenegger, L., Remus, U., Maier, R., & Kolb, D. G. (2023). Did you get my email?!—leveraging boundary work tactics to safeguard connectivity boundaries. Journal of Information Technology, 39(1), 123-148. https://doi.org/10.1177/02683962231175924
Yousefi Nooraie, R., Qin, Q., Wagg, A., Berta, W., & Estabrooks, C. (2024). Building a communication and support network among quality improvement teams in nursing homes: a longitudinal study of the scope trial. Implementation Science Communications, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-024-00559-y
Zhang, X. and Wang, X. (2020). Team learning in interdisciplinary research teams: antecedents and consequences. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(6), 1429-1455. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-07-2019-0372
İndir
Yayınlanmış
Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Sayı
Bölüm
Lisans
Telif Hakkı (c) 2025 Premium e-Journal of Social Sciences (PEJOSS)

Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.
