Yapay Zekâ Patentleri, Bilimsel Yayınlar ve Ekonomik Büyüme: G7 Ülkelerinden Kanıtlar


Özet Görüntüleme: 46 / PDF İndirme: 30

Yazarlar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19341442

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Artificial Intelligence, Economic Growth, Panel Data Analysis

Özet

Yapay zekâ teknolojileri, doğrudan buluşların temelini oluşturan ya da buluşların geliştirilmesinde kritik bir unsur olarak kullanılan yenilikçi teknolojileri kapsamaktadır. Bu çalışma, 1996-2022 dönemine ait yıllık verilerle G7 ülkeleri özelinde yapay zekâ patentleri, bilimsel yayınlar ve ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektedir. Uygun panel veri modelini belirlemek amacıyla F testi ve Hausman testi uygulanmıştır. Analizler sonucunda rassal etkiler modelinin kullanılabilir olduğu anlaşılmış; bu çerçevede değişen varyans, otokorelasyon ve birimler arası korelasyon sorunları değerlendirilmiştir. Söz konusu sorunların mevcut olması nedeniyle, rassal etkiler modeli Driscoll-Kraay sağlam hata tahmincisiyle yeniden tahmin edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, yapay zekâ patentlerinin ekonomik büyümeden ve bilimsel yayın sayısından olumlu yönde etkilendiğini göstermektedir.

İndirmeler

İndirme verileri henüz mevcut değil.

Referanslar

Aghion, P., Jones, B. F., & Jones, C. I. (2019). Artificial intelligence and economic growth. In A. Agrawal, J. Gans, & A. Goldfarb (Eds.), The economics of artificial intelligence: An agenda (pp. 237-282). University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226613338.003.0012.

Ali, A., & Sinha, K. (2014). Exploring the opportunities and challenges in nanotechnology innovation in India. J. Soc. Sci. Poli. Imp, 2(2), 227-251.

Azoulay, P., Graff Zivin, J. S., Sampat, B. N., & Wang, J. (2019). Public R&D investments and private-sector patenting: Evidence from NIH funding rules. Journal of Political Economy, 127(1), 93-143. https://doi.org/10.1086/700092

Baltagi, B. H. (2001). Econometric analysis of panel data. John Wiley.

Baltagi, B. H. (2005). Econometric analysis of panel data (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Britannica. (2023). What is artificial intelligence. https://www.britannica.com/question/What-is-artificial-intelligence

Britannica. (n.d.). Group of seven (G7). https://www.britannica.com/topic/Group-of-Seven

Chen, Y. L., & Chang, Y. C. (2012). A three-phase method for patent classification. Information Processing & Management, 48(6), 1017-1030.

Council on Foreign Relations. (2025, July 8). What does the G7 do? https://www.cfr.org/backgrounders/ what-does-g7-do

Dağlı, İ. (2022). Yapay zekâ teknolojilerinde etkili faktörler üzerine bir model denemesi: En başarılı ülkelerle panel veri analizi. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 17(2), 368-386. https://izlik.org/JA36LF33FT

Dalton, D. M., Burke, T. P., Kelly, E. G., & Curtin, P. D. (2016). Quantitative analysis of technological innovation in knee arthroplasty: Using patent and publication metrics to identify developments and trends. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 31(6), 1366-1372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.12.031

DeCanio, S. J. (2016). Robots and humans–complements or substitutes? Journal of Macroeconomics, 49, 280-291.

Frietsch, R., & Wang, J. (2007). Intellectual property rights and innovation activities in China: Evidence from patents and publications. Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Papers-Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis, No. 13.

Gonzales, J. T. (2023). Implications of AI innovation on economic growth: A panel data study. Journal of Economic Structures, 12(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-023-00307-w

Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep learning. MIT Press.

Greene, H. W. (1993). Econometric analysis. McMillan.

Greene, W. H. (2012). Econometric analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education.

Haenlein, M., & Kaplan, A. (2019). A brief history of artificial intelligence: On the past, present, and future of artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619864925

Hajnal, P. I. (2016). The G8 system and the G20: evolution, role and documentation. Routledge.

Heinze, T. (2004). Nanoscience and nanotechnology in Europe: Analysis of publications and patent applications including comparisons with the United States. Nanotech. L. & Bus., 1(4), 427-445.

Hoechle, D. (2007). Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence. The Stata Journal, 7(3), 281-312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0700700301

Hole, A., Bhandari, S., Birajdar, S., Surve, S., & Sarkate, A. (2025). Patenting artificial intelligence-based technologies in chemical and pharmaceutical sciences. In Artificial intelligence for chemical sciences: Concepts, models, and applications (pp. 73-97). Apple Academic Press.

Hu, S. (2020, January). Comparative study on patent eligibility of artificial intelligence in the United States, China and Japan. In 2020 International Conference on Intelligent Transportation, Big Data & Smart City (ICITBS) (pp. 965-968). IEEE.

Hsiao, C. (2003). Analysis of panel data (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Hullmann, A., & Meyer, M. (2003). Publications and patents in nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 58(3), 507-527.

Jotisakulratana, M., Koomgun, N., Virojrid, R., & Udomsaph, B. (2013, July). Applying International Patent Classification (IPC) to strategic planning processes of an R&D organization: The case of NECTEC, Thailand. In 2013 Proceedings of PICMET'13: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services (pp. 1913-1918). IEEE.

Kalai, M., Becha, H., & Helali, K. (2024). Effect of artificial intelligence on economic growth in European countries: A symmetric and asymmetric cointegration based on linear and non-linear ARDL approach. Journal of Economic Structures, 13(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-024-00345-y

Kim, Y. K., & Lee, K. (2015). Different impacts of scientific and technological knowledge on economic growth: Contrasting science and technology policy in East Asia and Latin America. Asian Economic Policy Review, 10(1), 43-66.

Liu, H., Tai, Y., Lin, H., & Du, X. (2022, January). Analysis of technology hotspots in artificial intelligence field based on patent map. In 2022 International Seminar on Computer Science and Engineering Technology (SCSET) (pp. 141-144). IEEE.

Nabiyev, V. V. (2005). Yapay zekâ: Problemler-yöntemler-algoritma (2. Baskı). Seçkin Yayıncılık.

National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2024). Global R&D and international comparisons. National Science Foundation. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20257/global-r-d-and-international-comparisons-2

Ntuli, H., Inglesi‐Lotz, R., Chang, T., & Pouris, A. (2015). Does research output cause economic growth or vice versa? Evidence from 34 OECD countries. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(8), 1709-1716. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23285

OECD. (2025). Identifying emerging AI technologies using patent data. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Papers.

Raghavender, G. R., & Singh, G. (2023). Can artificial intelligence (AI) machine be granted inventorship in India? Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28(2), 123-131.

Shapira, P., & Kwon, S. (2018). Synthetic biology research and innovation profile 2018. Publications and patents. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/485805

Singh, A., Wong, P. K., & Ho, Y. P. (2015). The role of universities in the national innovation systems of China and the East Asian NIEs: An exploratory analysis of publications and patenting data. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 23(2), 140-156.

Spegele, B., Douglas, J., & Kubota, Y. (2025). China’s Xi is building an economic fortress against US pressure. The Wall Street Journal, July 7.

State Council of the People's Republic of China. (2017). New generation artificial intelligence development plan. https://_ia.org/notice-state-council-issuing-newgeneration-arti_cial-intelligence-development-plan/

The Global Economy. (2023). Research and development expenditure (% of GDP) - G7 countries. https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/rankings/research_and_development/G7/

Thomas, V. J., Sharma, S., & Jain, S. K. (2011). Using patents and publications to assess R&D efficiency in the states of the USA. World Patent Information, 33(1), 4-10.

Ün, Turgut (2018). Panel veri modellerinin varsayımlarının testi. (Editör: Selahattin Güriş). Uygulamalı Panel Veri Ekonometrisi, İstanbul: Der Yayınları.

Wang, N., & Hagedoorn, J. (2014). The lag structure of the relationship between patenting and internal R&D revisited. Research Policy, 43(8), 1275-1285.

Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). MIT Press.

Wong, C. Y., Mohamad, Z. F., Keng, Z. X., & Azizan, S. A. (2014). Examining the patterns of innovation in low carbon energy science and technology: Publications and patents of Asian emerging economies. Energy Policy, 73, 789-802.

World Intellectual Property Organization. (2025). World intellectual property indicators 2025. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo-pub-941-17-2025-en-world-intellectual-property-indicators-2025.pdf

Yerdelen Tatoğlu, F. (2012). Panel veri ekonometrisi (1. Baskı). Beta Basım.

Zhang, T., Chen, J., & Ouyang, Z. (2022). The technology development trends in the field of artificial intelligence-assisted drug discovery based on patent analysis. Chinese Journal of New Drugs, 31(4).

İndir

Yayınlanmış

2026-03-31

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

Cebeci Mazlum, E. (2026). Yapay Zekâ Patentleri, Bilimsel Yayınlar ve Ekonomik Büyüme: G7 Ülkelerinden Kanıtlar. Premium E-Journal of Social Sciences (PEJOSS), 10(64), 490–499. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19341442