A Bibliometric Analysis of Inflation Uncertainty
Abstract views: 38
/ 
PDF downloads: 25
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14020779Keywords:
Inflation Uncertainty, Investment Decisions, Bibliometric AnalysisAbstract
This study aims to provide an in-depth review of the existing literature on inflation uncertainty, shedding light on the dynamics and trends of research in this field. Inflation uncertainty emerges as a crucial factor in shaping economic policy decisions and market expectations. The study employs bibliometric analysis methods to examine academic articles published between 1980 and 2024, sourced from the Web of Science databases. The data reveal a significant increase in the number of studies on inflation uncertainty, with research focusing on certain key terms.
The results highlight the relationship between inflation uncertainty and economic theories, the use of statistical models, and the importance of interdisciplinary approaches. Additionally, collaborations among prominent authors, institutions, and countries in this field have been identified. This bibliometric analysis systematically presents the body of knowledge on inflation uncertainty, offering a guiding framework for future research. The findings of this study could provide valuable insights for policymakers and economists in strategic decision-making processes.
Downloads
References
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review. Journal of Informetrics, 2(1), 1-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2007.11.001
Bernanke, B. (2004). The great moderation. Washington, DC.
Bozkurt, A. A., & Gökmenoğlu, M. (2023). Enflasyon ve işsizlik arasındaki ilişkiyi konu alan çalışmaların bibliyometrik ağ analizi. Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(2), 78-110. https://doi.org/10.53443/anadoluibfd.1185966
Cukierman, A. ve Meltzer, A. H. (1986). A theory of ambiguity, credibility, and inflation under discretion and asymmetric information. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1099-1128.
Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105, 1809-1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z
Gökmenoğlu, M., & Yavuz, İ. S. (2022). Kamu harcamaları ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisine yönelik çalışmaların bibliyometrik ağ analizi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 52, 231-252. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1088158
Konur, O. (2012). The Evaluation of the global research on the eucation: A Scientometric approach. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 1363-1367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro. 2012.06.827
Lancaster, F. W. (1977). A Bibliometric Analysis. Library Trends, 56(4), 954-967.
Li, J., Burnham, J. F., Lemley, T., & Britton, R. M. (2010). Citation Analysis: Comparison of Web of Science®, ScopusTM, SciFinder®, and Google Scholar. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 7(3), 196-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/15424065.2010.505518
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., & Noyons, E. C. M. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629-635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010. 07.002
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2014). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Premium e-Journal of Social Science (PEJOSS)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
