İkiliklerin Ötesini Düşünmek: Örgütsel Paradokslar Çağında Liderlik


Özet Görüntüleme: 69 / PDF İndirme: 48

Yazarlar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10459335

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Abilene paradoksu, İkarus paradoksu, ikilik, güç, örgütsel paradoks, paradoksal liderlik

Özet

Türkiye'de liderlik uygulamaları, bireyselciliğe karşı kolektivizm, ilişki odaklılığa karşı performans odaklılık ve yüksek belirsizlik düzeyine karşın belirsizlikten kaçınma eğilimi gibi çelişkili görülen kültürel unsurların dengeli bir bileşimini yansıtmaktadır. Çelişkili unsurlar arasında ortaya çıkan bu gerilimi anlayabilmek, paradoks kuramının teorik çerçevesini gerekli kılmaktadır. Bu çalışma, paradoks kuramının unsurlarını temel alarak örgütler alanında paradoksları ne şekilde kavrayabileceğimize yönelik bir çerçeve sunmayı amaçlamaktadır. Örgütler günümüzde yalın çevre dinamikleri ile tanımlanmaktan oldukça uzaktır. Örgütleri etkileyen çevre dinamiklerinde görülen artış örgütsel sistemlerin karmaşıklığını da arttırmaktadır. Sistemdeki karmaşıklık düzeyi, ortaya çıkabilecek paradoksların çeşitliliği ve çokluğu ile yakından alakalıdır. Çalışmada İkarus paradoksu, Abilene paradoksu, güç paradoksu, başarı paradoksu gibi örgütler düzleminde karşılaşılabilecek paradoksların neler olduğu, hangi alanlarda ortaya çıkabileceği ve nasıl aşılabileceğine yönelik çıkarımlar ve stratejiler sunulmaktadır. Çalışmada ayrıca paradoksal durumlar karşısında liderliğin önemi, liderin geleneksel liderlikten farklı olarak taşıması gereken bilişsel ve davranışsal nitelikleri üzerinde durulmuş ve paradoksal liderlik stilinin çalışan davranışları ve örgüt kültürü açısından olası sonuçları tartışılmıştır. Yazında konu ile ilgili oldukça sınırlı çalışmanın varlığını göz önünde bulundurarak, çalışmanın gelecekteki araştırmalar açısından faydalı olacağı düşünülmektedir.

İndirmeler

İndirme verileri henüz mevcut değil.

Referanslar

Adler, P. S., Goldoftas, B., ve Levine, E. (1999). Flexibility vs. efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota Product System. Organization Science, 10, 43– 68.

Alghamdi, F. (2018). Ambidextrous leadership, ambidextrous employee, and the interaction between ambidextrous leadership and employee innovative performance. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 7, 1 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-018-0081-8

Anderson, M. H., ve Sun, P. Y. T. (2017). Reviewing leadership styles: Overlaps and the need for a new ‘full‐range’ theory. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(1), 76–96. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/ijmr.12082

Apker, J. (2004). Sensemaking of change in the managed care era: a case of hospital‐based nurses, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17(2), 211-227.https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810410530 629

Ashforth, B. (1994). Petty Tyranny in Organizations. Human Relations, 47(7), 755-778. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/001872679404700701

Atuahene-Gima, K. 2005. Resolving the capability-Rigidity paradox in new product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 69 (4), 61–83.

Backhaus, L., Reuber, A R., Vogel, D., ve Vogel, R. (2022). Giving sense about paradoxes: paradoxical leadership in the public sector, Public Management Review, 24(9), 1478-1498, DOI: 10.1080/ 14719037.2021.1906935

Bardoel, A. (2020). Managing Work-Life Tensions: The Challenges for Multinational Enterprises (MNEs). In: Nieuwenhuis, R., Van Lancker, W. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Family Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54618-2_23

Başar, U., Sığrı, Ü. ve Basım, N. (2016). İş yerinde karanlık liderlik. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 3(2), 65–76.

Board, D. (2010). Leadership: The ghost at the trillion dollar crash?, European Management Journal, 28(4), 269-277.

Boemelburg, R., Zimmermann, A., ve Palmié, M. (2020). Learning paradox: antecedents and mechanisms of paradox mindset development. Academy of Management Proceedings, https://doi.org/ 10.5465/AMBPP.2020 .12624abstract

Chen, S., Zhang, Y., Lili, L., ve Shen, T. (2021). Does paradoxical leadership facilitate leaders' task performance? a perspective of self-regulation theory. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 18(7), 3505. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073505. PMID: 33800591; PMCID: PMC8037983.

Chenchen, N., Meng, X., ve Fei, X. (2022). The double-edged sword effect of paradoxical leadership to organizational citizenship behavior, Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 15, 2513-2527, DOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S380383

Collins, M D. (2023). A multiperspective approach to paradoxical leadership: the moderating effect of intelligence and trait emotions on leader behavior, Leadership ve Organization Development Journal, 44(6), 812-832. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-02-2023-0077 L L.

Conger, J. A. (1990). The dark side of leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 19(2), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(90)90070-6

Cunha, M P E., Giustiniano, L., Rego, A., ve Clegg, S. (2017). Mission impossible? The paradoxes of stretch goal setting. Management Learning, 48(2), 140-157. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050 7616664289

Cunha, M. P. e, ve Putnam, L. L. (2019). Paradox theory and the paradox of success. Strategic Organization, 17(1), 95-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127017739536

Donaldson, T., ve Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.

Gerstner, C. R., ve Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-Analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 827–844. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.827

Glad, B. (2002). Why tyrants go too far: Malignant narcissism and absolute power. Political Psychology, 23, 1-37.

Hald, K.S. and Nordio, C. (2021). Ambidexterity in collaborative new product development processes, Business Process Management Journal, 27(3), 987-1008. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-05-2020-0220

Häll, A., Tengblad, S., Oudhuis, M. and Dellve, L. (2023). How hard can it be? A qualitative study following an HRT implementation in a global industrial corporate group, Personnel Review, 52 (5), 1632-1646. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-05-2020-0377

Hall, R. (2017). Modeling leadership-related change with a growth curve approach. In B. Schyns, R. Hall, and P. Neves (Eds.), Handbook of methods in leadership research (317-346). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785367281.00021

Hannah, S T., Woolfolk, R L., ve Lord, R G. (2009). Leader self-structure: a framework for positive leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(2), 269–290. http://www.jstor.org/stable/ 41683829

Heine, K. and Rindfleisch, H. (2013). Organizational decline. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 26(1), 8–28.

Henriksen, K., ve Dayton, E. (2006). Organizational silence and hidden threats to patient safety. Health Services Research, 41(4p2), 1539-1554. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00564.x

Hou, Z., ve Wang, D. (2023, March). Paradoxical Leadership in Engineering management, Uncertainty Tolerance and Promotion Job Crafting. In ICICA 2022: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Information, Control and Automation, ICICA 2022, December 2-4, 2022, Chongqing, China (p. 358). European Alliance for Innovation.

Huang, D., Zhu, T., Wu, Y., ve Sun, T. (2022). Huang D, Zhu T, Wu Y, Sun T. A Study on Paradoxical Leadership and Multiple Path Mechanisms of Employees' Bootleg Innovation. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 22,15. 3391-3407. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S383155. PMID: 36444276; PMCID: PMC9700461.

Husain, R. B. M., ve Xiao, L. X. (2016). The antecedents of women leadership in SMEs: The Malaysian senior female managerial perspective. International Journal of Business and Management, 11(5), 179.

Ingram, A. E., Lewis, M. W., Barton, S., ve Gartner, W. B. (2016). Paradoxes and Innovation in Family Firms: The Role of Paradoxical Thinking. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(1), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12113

Jarzabkowski, P., ve Sillince, J. (2007). A rhetoric-in-context approach to building commitment to multiple strategic goals. Organizational Studies, 28, 1639–1665.

Julmi, C. (2021). Crazy, stupid, disobedience: The dark side of paradoxical leadership. Leadership, 17(6), 631-653.

Jung, K. B., Kang, S. W., ve Choi, S. B. (2022). Paradoxical leadership and involvement in creative task via creative self-efficacy: a moderated mediation role of task complexity. Behavioral Sciences, 12(10), 377.

Kan, M. M., & Parry, K. W. (2004). Identifying paradox: A grounded theory of leadership in overcoming resistance to change. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(4), 467-491.

Karakitapoğlu-Aygün, Z., ve Gumusluoglu, L. (2013). The bright and dark sides of leadership: Transformational vs. non-transformational leadership in a non-Western context. Leadership, 9, 107-133.

Kellerman, B. (2004). Bad leadership: What it is, how it happens, why it matters. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Kets de Vries, M. F. R. (1995). Life and death in the executive fast lane: Essays on irrational organizations and their leaders. Jossey-Bass.

Klonek, F. E., Volery, T. ve Parker, S. K. (2021). Managing the paradox: Individual ambidexterity, paradoxical leadership and multitasking in entrepreneurs across firm life cycle stages. International Small Business Journal, 39(1), 40-63.

Kodama M (2003). Strategic community-based theory of firms: case study of dialectical management at NTT DoCoMo. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 21(6): 603–634.

Lamond, D. (2004). A matter of style: reconciling Henri and Henry. Management Decision, 42(2), 330-356.

Leclercq‐Vandelannoitte, A. (2013). Contradiction as a medium and outcome of organizational change: a Foucauldian reading. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 26(3), 556-572.

Leung, A. K. Y., Liou, S., Miron-Spektor, E., Koh, B., Chan, D., Eisenberg, R. ve Schneider, I. (2018). Middle ground approach to paradox: Within-and between-culture examination of the creative benefits of paradoxical frames. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(3), 443.

Lewis, M. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more compre- hensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25, 760 –776.

Liden, R. C., Sparrowe, R. T. ve Wayne, S. J. (1997). Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management, 15, 47–119.

Lipman-Blumen, J. (2005). Toxic leadership: When grand illusions masquerade as noble visions. Leader to Leader, 2005: 29-36. https://doi.org/10.1002/ltl.125

Lord, R. G., Foti, R. J., ve De Vader, C. L. (1984). A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organizational behavior and human performance, 34(3), 343-378.

Luo, B. N., Tang, Y., Chen, E. W., Li, S., ve Luo, D. (2020). Corporate sustainability paradox management: A systematic review and future agenda. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 579272.

Mann, R. D. (1959). A review of the relationships between personality and performance in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 241- 270.

Margolis, J. D., ve Walsh, J. (2003). Misery loves company: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305.

Marks, M. A., ve Panzer, F. J. (2004). The influence of team monitoring on team processes and performance. Human Performance, 17(1), 25-41.

McAvoy, J., ve Butler, T. (2007). The impact of the Abilene Paradox on double-loop learning in an agile team. Information and Software Technology, 49(6), 552-563.

Meng, X., Chenchen, N., Liang, F., ve Ocean Liu, Y. (2021). Research on the influence of paradoxical leadership on compulsory organizational citizenship behavior. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 1959-1970.

Miller, D. (1993). The architecture of simplicity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 116–138.

O’Reilly, C., ve Tushman, M. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dy- namic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185–206.

Osono, E., Shimizu, N., ve Takeuchi, H. (2008). Extreme Toyota: Radical contradictions that drive success at the world’s best manufacturer. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Padilla, A., Hogan, R., ve Kaiser, R. B. (2007). The toxic triangle: Destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 176–194.

Pan, Z. (2021). Paradoxical leadership and organizational citizenship behaviour: the serial mediating effect of a paradoxical mindset and personal service orientation. Leadership ve Organization Development Journal, 42(6), 869-881.

Poole, M. S., ve Van de Ven, A. (1989). Using paradox to build management and organizational theory. Academy of Management Review, 14, 562–578.

Popper, M. and Druyan, N. (2001), "Cultural prototypes? Or leaders’ behaviors? A study on workers’ perceptions of leadership in an electronics industry", Journal of Managerial Psychology, 16 (7), 549-558. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006167

Putnam, L. (1986). Contradictions and paradoxes in organizations. In L. Thayer (Ed.), Organization communications: Emerging perspectives: 151–167. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Quansah, E., Moghaddam, K., Solansky, S. and Wang, Y. (2022), Strategic leadership in SMEs: the mediating role of dynamic capabilities, Leadership ve Organization Development Journal, 43(8), p1308-1320. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-05-2021-0229

Rockwell, S. (2016). Identity processes to trigger turnaround in response to organizational decline. International Journal of Business and Management, 11(3), 11.

Sanjeev, R., ve Singh, A. (2017). Talent management for developing leadership: An empirical investigation. Independent Journal of Management ve Production, 8(3), 1130-1146.

Schad, J., Lewis, M., Raisch, S., ve Smith, W. (2016). Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1).

Shvindina, H. (2017, January 1). Leadership as a driver for organizational change. Business Ethics and Leadership, 1(1), 74-82.

Smith, K., ve Berg, D. (1987). Paradoxes of group life. San Fran- cisco: Josey-Bass.

Smith, W. K., ve Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic equilibrium Model of Organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403. doi:10.5465/amr.2009.0223

Stogdill, R. M. (1959). Individual behavior and group achievement. New York: Oxford University Press.

Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of Abusive Supervision. The Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556375

Tse T (2013) Paradox resolution: A means to achieve strategic innovation. European Management Journal, 31(6): 682–696.

Tuin, L V., Schaufeli, W B., Rhenen, W V., ve Kuiper, R M. (2020). Business results and well-being: an engaging leadership ıntervention study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 23;17(12):4515. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124515. PMID: 32585988; PMCID: PMC7345976.

Volkema, R. J., ve Kapoutsis, I. (2016). From restaurants to board rooms: How initiating negotiations teaches management principles and theory. Journal of Management Education, 40(1), 76-101.

Wicker, M. (1996). Toxic leaders: When organizations go bad. Westport, CT: Praeger

Wilson, S., ve McCalman, J. (2017). Re-imagining ethical leadership as leadership for the greater good. European Management Journal, 35(2), 151-154.

Xing, Y., Liu, Y., Froese, F. J., ve Huang, M. (2023). Advancing Chinese leadership research: review and future directions. Asian Business ve Management, 22(2), 493-508.

Yang, Y., Fan, Y., ve Jia, J. (2022). The Eastern construction of paradoxical cognitive framework and its antecedents: a Yin–Yang balancing perspective, Chinese Management Studies, 16(5), 1081-1107. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-12-2020-0577

İndir

Yayınlanmış

2023-12-31

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

Kocakula, Özge. (2023). İkiliklerin Ötesini Düşünmek: Örgütsel Paradokslar Çağında Liderlik. Premium E-Journal of Social Sciences (PEJOSS), 7(37), 1998–2015. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10459335