THE QUESTIONING OF ART ETHICS

Abstract

art is an action that has succeeded in being a republic by destroying all perceptions, and it is pluralistic and broad and
acceptable to everyone. On the contrary, there is a section that states that art is not a single concept that covers all the
situations of art. There is something inclusive to prove that art is somehow universal. As for contemporary art, the current
art is highly legitimate, but it is striking, interesting and challenging though. Curators, sales by auction, name-built
galleries are the guardians dealing with everything that the artist defines as art. I want to talk about art or art discipline.
Is the moral of art and discipline really there? If any, how is the rule determined, or, in fact, is art itself irrelevant and
without a theme, in fact, is the art ethic?